City of Jamestown<\/p>\n
Board of Equalization Meeting<\/p>\n
April 12, 2022<\/p>\n
Unofficial Minutes<\/p>\n
The Board of Equalization was called to order by Mayor Heinrich at 4:00 p.m.<\/p>\n
Roll Call showed the following members present:\u00a0 Mayor Heinrich, Council Members Steele, Kamlitz and Schloegel, City Assessor Veil, City Administrator Hellekson, and City Appraiser Stroh. Council Member Buchanan was absent.<\/p>\n
City Assessor Veil presented his annual report to the board. City Assessor Veil recommended accepting the valuation as presented which is part of the approving and accepting the real property assessments for 2022 and provides Mr. Traut the opportunity to appeal to the County Board of Equalization.<\/p>\n Council Member Steele moved to accept the City Assessors report regarding property valuation on Parcel 74-6849000. Seconded by Schloegel.\u00a0 Roll Call No. 1 showed 4 ayes, 0 nays, 1 absent. Carried.<\/p>\n Council Member Steele moved a Resolution to approve and accept the real property assessments for 2022, as submitted by the City Assessor, in the total taxable value of $52,728,121, subject to qualified adjustments, the TIF, 2022 utilities, homestead credits, and disabled veterans\u2019 credits.\u00a0 Seconded by Council Member Kamlitz.\u00a0 Roll Call No. 2 showed 4 ayes, 0 nays, 1 absent. Carried.<\/p>\n Council Member Kamlitz moved to adjourn at 4:44 p.m.\u00a0 Seconded by Council Member Steele.\u00a0 Unanimous aye vote.\u00a0 Carried.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" City of Jamestown Board of Equalization Meeting April 12, 2022 Unofficial Minutes The Board of Equalization was called to order by Mayor Heinrich at 4:00 p.m. Roll Call showed the following members present:\u00a0 Mayor Heinrich, Council Members Steele, Kamlitz and Schloegel, City Assessor Veil, City Administrator Hellekson, and City Appraiser […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":19307,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[14],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-246869","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-jamestown"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/csinewsnow.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/246869","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/csinewsnow.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/csinewsnow.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/csinewsnow.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/csinewsnow.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=246869"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"http:\/\/csinewsnow.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/246869\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":246903,"href":"http:\/\/csinewsnow.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/246869\/revisions\/246903"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/csinewsnow.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/19307"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/csinewsnow.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=246869"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/csinewsnow.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=246869"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/csinewsnow.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=246869"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}
\nThere was one written appeal from William Traut, 317 10th<\/sup> Street Southwest for Parcel 74-6849000 requesting the value remain at the previous value of $53,248 rather than the 2022 taxable value of $76,300.\u00a0 Mr. Traut did not appear at the meeting. City Assessor Veil stated the 2022 valuation on this property is based on an exterior appraisal due to as the assessors were twice denied entry to the property to view the interior of the residence. City Assessor Veil noted the property owners have an easement for the house which sits partially on an adjoining lot which was in place at the time of purchase. That easement transfers with the property and terminates should the house be removed. City Assessor Veil noted that the land is valued at two-thirds its value due to location and actual size and that the property is undervalued.<\/p>\n